What constitutes valid criticism?
We have just received feedback (teachers are always given evaluation sheets to fill in so that we can improve our workshops) on one of our new workshops which has made me rather cross. No, it wasn't because it criticised me because it didn't. It was that it covered things wholly outside our control like the fact that it was very hot. The whole of Europe was very hot. It was hot playing football in Germany. It was hot hunting bugs in the park. It was hot being ancient Egyptians in the museum. So what? It was hot.
It's a variant on what I call the apple pie criticism fallacy.
By all means mention that the crust is soggy or hard, or that the apple has pips and stalk left in - that is valid criticism of an apple pie that wasn't up to standard. Say if you think your helping was too large or too small - your apple pie should be value for money. Mention that you realise it is a matter of taste, but you would have preferred it sweeter or less sweet, shortcrust rather than puff pastry, or would like the addition of some spices or another fruit such as blackberries - any of these may be things that the cook might want to change next time or offer as an alternative. Even mention in passing that you would have liked a bowl rather than a plate, but accept that this may not suit other people who prefer the plate. But don't go on about the fact that you would rather it had been treacle sponge (apple pie was the pudding you ordered), or that you arrived late and had to eat too fast, or that you were already full when you sat down to eat or that you would rather the restaurant was somewhere else or built in a different style - those are all problems outside the cook's remit and have nothing to do with the apple pie.
One particular teacher also citicised the mummifying activity as "Too undemanding"! Every group (including hers) has loved the mummifying activity, but it is worth remembering what has to be covered in devising any workshop before criticising part of it for being too easy for a particular group.
We have to devise the activities for a wide range of children and, although we adjust our delivery to the age of the class, the props and the content have to remain pretty constant. This particular workshop is for Key Stage 2 (Juniors aged 7 to 11) so it has to suit the least academically inclined year 3 whose class (in an inner-city school where less than 50% of children have English as a first language) is using the workshop as an introduction to the subject, to the brightest and most enthusiastic year 6 historian just completing a term's intensive work on every aspect of the subject. (This applies to every workshop we do except that for some we substitute naturalist for historian, some are KS1 and some cover the full range of primary education with only minor variations between KS1 and KS2 versions)
In the Victorian Laundry which covers the widest range of ages we all have our own extra information which we give to the older groups. For example I go from washing clothes to sanitation in general, while Hilary deals with the change from natural to synthetic fabrics.
One of the things I find particularly fascinating with the Victorian School is that from dip pens to corporal punishment how much was still unchanged when the older teachers and I were at school in the 1960s, and how totally foreign it is to most of the younger teachers and all of the children.
